Losing the last Hindu Kindom – where lies and democracy wins

he elections to the Nepal assembly are over, and now counting of votes began. There were lot of international observers and monitoring agencies who came there to monitor the elections. The results will be announced after 10 days.

The newspapers so far, projected as though the holy, never-wrong democracy is flourishing over the Monarch and fuedalism. The Maoists, who butchered numerous people, created lawlessness through out the country, and involved in rowdyism, totalitarian and fascist acts are now projected as those who are longing for peace.

Is there anything called Justice or righteousness here?

What is the problem with the king? He has provided stability, and security to the people of Nepal.

Are our Indic Kings feudal?

Before that, let’s see what is meant by feudalism.

As per wikipedia, feudalism is d

Feudalism, a term first used in the early modern period (17th century), in its most classic sense refers to a Medieval European political “system” comprised of a set of reciprocal legal and military obligations among the warrior nobility, revolving around the three key concepts of lords, vassals, and fiefs.

Feudalism is essentially characterised by lords, vassals and serfs. This is the characteristics of western society, where the people has to accept the authority of the kings.  Much of the lands was owned by nobles, who inturn control the people in their respective areas.

So essentially, there are few noble landlords who controlled the entire country and people, and the kings controlling these landlords.  The common people were mere slaves.

So, what was there in India?  It has been entirely different from the above.  There is no such thing called slaves.  Rather, people lived in a commune way.  Each commune was brought under a local ruler, who is responsible for the administration of the area.  Normally, the community which does agriculture is given the local administrative tasks.

Relation b/w Kings and People:

However in India, the relationship b/w kings and people were based on the concept called Dharma.  Who ever becomes the king, the people accepted him as long as he stuck to the dharma of a ruler.  So, people worshipped the rightful king as God, and the kings in turn treat his subjects with respect.

We can see this beautiful relation in Bhutan, Thailand, and Nepal.

Not only kings.  Any person, who protects the people were in turn reverred by the people.  Earlier, it was the warriors who protected people.  Later, during muslim rule and british rule, where political class lost its power, people reverred those wealthy persons who helped them in critical situations.  Many of the chettiars are once largest donors to the society.

In western society, this kind of mutual respect was absent. Any one who do not accept the king is tortured or killed.  The relation b/w people are more or less master slave.

Imposition of western model in India:

When britishers completely dominated India, the first thing they targetted was the political centre of all regions.  Most of the endowments to temples and educational institutions were unsurped, and later, the eurpoean model of polity was introduced.

Those who offer more wealth to britishers and co-operate with them are given powers whereas Indian kings gave powers to those who administer the area well.

Thus, over the 200 years of british rule, the european model of feudalism started creeping in.

Deliberate Media mis-representation:

Let’s consider the Nepal situation.  The earlier king Birendra was loved by the whole nepal people.  Later, unfortunately his whole family was massacred.  IT was alleged that king gnanendra was responsible for the events.  The people also became suspicious, and he has lost some respect among people.

Imagine.. Losing some respect itself is a sever blow to the king, and hence most of indian kings feared for people’s opinion.  This aspect is completely absent in western monarchy.  Another factor which shows us that indian kings were not Feudal.

Ok..  But, the usual business continued. King did his duty, and the people did not have much problem from him.

This is the reason, why there was no opposition from the people to Gnanendra.

The maoist atrocities:

It was the maoist who started violence during the rule of King Birendra itself.  Again, the usual artificial scenario was taken up.  They tried to project as though king is suppressing everyone.  But it falied much, as there was not much support from the people.

So, later they employed the usual tactics of revolutionaries from Che Guevara’s Guerilla Warfare book.  These are as follows.

• establish a base in the jungle.
• Attack all the governmental institution in the country side, so that the government could not function there.
• Create a situation, where there is no alternative to the revolutionaries.
• THen launch the struggle towards the urban centres, and finally capture the power.

If we see the history of maoist, this has been what happened so far.  The maoist unleashed wave of terror, so that no one dared to oppose them.  THus virtually there was no alternative to them.

However, due to India’s support to the king, and people’s acceptance of the king, the maoist could not make any inroads in to the urban centres much.

Role of Church:

Maoist leader is a christian.  And its obvious, that the international missionaries has been behind the recent hijack of the monarch.  They had been attempting for conversion programmes for many years, but the king
had kept them away. So there is a need to overthrow him, to continue their cultural genocide.

Role of India:

Traditionally, India has been the supporter of the king, as the king is culutrally more close to india.  But, the last government being virtually hijacked by madam antonio maino, alias sonia gandhi, there was no one to deal with any crisis that india faced.  The PM being a dummy role, and with real power existing with non-acting, incapable sonia gandhi,  the situations in nepal has been deliberately left to degrade.

One factor is the communists locking the government.

Another factor is the fact that sonia gandhi is a catholic christian.  She has no other option, except to support the missionaries in overthrowing the king.

Role of China:

Its an open secret that china is behind the maoists.  But, they also seem to be cautious in dealing with them, as they also supported the king earlier.  It seems the are playing double game earlier to keep nepal in check, and now openly sided with the maoists.

Why should Monarchy be abolished?

No one seems to ask this question.  With most medias under western control and maoists control, there was deliberate unreasonable propoganda against the king.  Even BBC is believed to have included in this propoganda.

Without ever reasoning properly, they started putting news like “Nepal is geared up for secular republic” ..  No proofs or no representation of people’s voices in these newspapers..  But, they tried to project as if the people are welcoming the change and against the king.

Particularly, no one ever asked the question “Why not nepal be Hindu state?” when the 95% of its people are Hindus.  No press seems to ask, or let the hindu people’s voice be represented.

The reason is that the secularism has been deliberately thrust upon Nepal, to aid christian conversion.

The behaviour of Maoists:

If we see at the behaviour of Maoists, they have been virtually representing totalitarian regime.  Prachanda is worse than stalin.  There is no alternate views allowed.

The youth communist league has unleashed violence against every opponens that nepal PM koirala termed them as Youth Criminalist league.

Why should the international community support such criminal organisation.

Shouldnt Prachanda be put behind international court for organising mass murders on the Nepal people?

Hijacking of Democracy:

This democracy is the most comedy ever happened in Nepal.  The royalists are deliberately suppressed by the maoist.  They had already suppressed all emerging leaders in the country side, which is their strong hold.  With money from china pumped, they had established their safe base.

Till the date of election, violence continued.  Former killers from maoist side now standing elections.

The international media, hides the fact that peaceful nepal has been shattered by maoist, and in turn, hail them as heroes who had enough heart to change themselves to peaceful path.

Once again, the business of peace and democracy is staged to suit vested interests of some international lobby.

Indias self-inflicted foolishness:

The church is openly working for its selfish interests.  The maoist for their selfish needs.  The america, the britain, pakistan and china, all are playing their role to secure a place to contain india.

But, India remote controlled by inactive antonia maino , seems to be voluntarily letting its neighbour to get in to paralysis.  A nation strongly affiliated to india culturally, is not going in to the hands of those people, who are dead against india, and Hinduism.

Its hightime that we save india first from this foreign lady, and then from the maoists.  The need of the hour is our indian learned men, to realise this utter dangers.